posts: 45742
Data license: Public Domain
This data as json
| post_id | thread_id | thread_title | post_number | author_username | post_date | post_date_iso | post_body |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45742 | 508 | a note from the source. | 84 | dogleg | Mar 14, 2013 | 2013-03-14T12:26:54-0400 | Psychology has a lot to say about clinical denial (C-D). Fortunately, I'm not a clinical psychologist. However, as a trained internetter and rational human being, it doesn't matter whether or not Hulet lied or if leprechauns fart rainbows because that is simply not what is being discussed. What is being discussed is the story that you've erected and subsequently defended about the interview itself. You incessantly baited TSJ to interview you, so they did. They flew half-way around the world to speak with the self-aggrandized Ray Stewart and found just that; a man with nothing more to show for himself than the very thing he thinks of himself. The plot thickens when the interview never gets published, causing you to bad-mouth TSJ, it's interviewers, and it's editors. While Hulet and company truly believed that you were an interesting dude, worthy of interviewing, it seems like what they found when they arrived in the land of kiwi's, peeling lefts, and neanderthal, tunic-clad narcissists is that the sociopath they were to interview was simply not good enough for the publication. They leave and the story never gets published. Typical of adolescents, Ray finds himself throwing a fit where everyone is to blame aside from himself. The world is against him, the sky is falling, and the roof is caving in. End of story. You would not only be a liar but a damned fool to refute this. |