posts: 169197
Data license: Public Domain
This data as json
| post_id | thread_id | thread_title | post_number | author_username | post_date | post_date_iso | post_body |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 169197 | 7938 | CVOID-19 REAL (non media) Hands on Data | 65 | SdSurferguy | Mar 30, 2020 | 2020-03-30T12:58:49-0400 | Yes but remember for a long time they were only testing people who were ending up in the ICU at death's door. Even now testing isn't available for everyone. The dataset is skewed, especially in the United States and other areas where testing isn't readily available. I'm not saying it won't be bad, just that you can't extrapolate on those numbers. Chilly Willy said: That's the one I've been using. Trustworthy information... Johns Hopkins is about as legit as they come. What's shocking is that if you look at the stats for former patients whose outcome is known (because they have either recovered or died), 18% of former COVID patients have died worldwide. If no one else were to get it and that statistic continues, we'd be looking at an additional 98,924 deaths. Showing my work for the teacher: D (Deaths) = 35,305 R (Recovered) = 156,841 C (total Completed) = D+R = 192,146 M (Mortality rate) = D/C = 0.18 = 18% T (Total cases) = 741724 P (current Patients) = T-C = 549,578 X (eXpected deaths) = P * 0.18 = 98,924 Click to expand... |