{"database": "surfing", "table": "posts", "rows": [["220564", "11248", "Twinzer Design/Experiment.", 73, "XXX", "Sep 19, 2021", "2021-09-19T13:45:00-0400", "Bruce Fowler said: \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n            I've thought about doing a V Machine Twinzer version. It's a very natural evolution to offer this option. \n\n\n\nThe design is well suited to \nany \nfin configuration, and adding this option would make it a very viable design...\n        \n\n\nClick to expand...\n\n\n\n\nI realize your V Machine has evolved away from those early long and deep panel Vees with belly forward. But do they show any of the tendency to track those plastic machines were known for? I remember getting stuck on one panel or the other many times.\n\n\n\nI wonder if a twinzer fin set-up would help reduce any tendency to track? \n\n\n\nOn a similar note, If the canard serves primarily to improve the function of the main fin, is that comparable to running a larger/deeper main fin? Those original plastic machines Vee bottoms had the deepest single fins I ever saw."]], "columns": ["post_id", "thread_id", "thread_title", "post_number", "author_username", "post_date", "post_date_iso", "post_body"], "primary_keys": ["post_id"], "primary_key_values": ["220564"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 0.6062600004952401, "license": "Public Domain"}